Back |
The Ustasha as Witnesses
The big problem with the "investigation" was the lack of evidence from NDH archives about Andrija's "traitorous" conduct at the Ustasha prison and camp. Not one OZN or Udba leader in Croatia who combed through the NDH archive saw even one document which would charge Andrija Hebrang, claimed one of their insiders, Zvonko Ivakovic. Andrija's Ustasha investigator Tibor Vasko (Vaško), while serving time in Srijemska Mitrovica, told Milovan Djilas in 1956 that in 1948 he had been forced to confirm that Andrija had agreed to collaborate with the Ustasha: "My conscience did not allow me to do it. Moreover, I knew nothing about any such thing". Milatovic and the comrades found inspiration in the Dachau rigged political trials which were held in Ljubljana in 1948, when old communists and Dachau inmates were forced to confess that they had been Gestapo agents and worked for western secret services after the war. (The verdicts were quashed in 1976, those innocently killed, accused and convicted were rehabilitated.) Police services also interrogated Drago Jilek, an Ustasha Surveillance Service (UNS) commander who had other duties as well, Miroslav Fulanovic (Fulanović), aide to UNS commander Eugen Kvaternik, intelligence chief Erih Lisak, Stjepan Damic, who was intelligence chief for the entire NDH, investigator Kresimir Suklje (Šuklje), political police chiefs Mirko Vutuc and Aleksandar Benak, and others. To find some they went abroad, kidnapping or killing them. There were attempted kidnapings of their wives for blackmail as well. Paradoxically, the Ustasha at Glavnjaca were more moral than Milatovic and the comrades. They could not be bought, whole those whose testimonies were extorted by torture later denied them or the testimonies proved unconvincing for other reasons. Here is what Dr Ante Ciliga wrote in the June 1982 issue of the "Na pragu sutrasnjice" quarterly in an open letter to "investigator" Milatovic, in response to claims Milatovic made in Belgrade-based print media about a statement by two Ustasha officials who confirmed that Andrija had "collaborated" with the Ustasha: "It is immediately evident that you failed to give the names of those two... What you failed to do, I shall not: the two Ustasha officials in question are - Drago Jilek and Branko Rukavina. They are both dead, which makes your silence about their names all the more suspicious. You write that one of them "happened to be" in Yugoslavia. You do not say how he "happened to be" in Yugoslavia, so I shall do it: he had been captured by Yugoslav partisan agents in Rome... That was Drago Jilek. You know very well the worth of statements by a captured and tortured man, which is why you keep quiet about his name and his end, that he was killed by Yugoslav authorities. One circumstance indicates that Drago Jilek refused to give the Yugoslav police statements and "evidence" they asked of him for an accusation against Hebrang for a long time. Namely, for some time after Jilek's capture, Yugoslav agents tried to capture his wife as well. Evidently, her capture and transfer to Yugoslavia were intended to break Jilek's resistance. This attempt is all the more important given that Jilek's wife was in South America, in Paraguay, where she worked in a drugstore, which is where her kidnapping was attempted. Due to the woman's energetic resistance and her desperate cries, which attracted the attention of those in the neighbourhood, the Yugoslav agents retreated and ran away. Jilek's capture in Rome and the attempted kidnapping in Paraguay received a lot of press coverage at the time. The statements and "evidence" given by Branko Rukavina are equally worthless, because they were bought and paid for with 300,000 lire, which today corresponds to ten million lire... Later, when some Croatian emigrants reproached him for his actions, Branko would say: 'Let the communists eat one another, they will all die sooner'..." (According to Branko Salaj, "Belgrade's Persistent Lies About Hebrang", "Free Croatia's Message", March 1983.)
|